Could they please just make up their mind already? Calhoun argues from a lesbian perspective for the rights of gay families, thus she writes, …artificial insemination, contract pregnancy, and the like undermine cultural understandings of the marital couple as a naturally reproductive unit, introduce non-related others into the reproductive process, and make it possible for women and men to have children without a homosexual partner Calhoun, So why do we deny same-sex couples marriage?
So if same-sex marriage has no effect on heterosexual marriage, what else could possibly be stopping us from legalising it? Having more than one wife is known as polygamy and in a study of a large number of societies Murdock found that polygamy was a central feature in the majority of them. It would seem that any relationships that contradict the patriarchal norm are atypical and therefore should be resisted. Allowing same-sex marriage will result in both parties receiving identical benefits, it will result in equality. He contends that if this is not to happen then homosexuals must be given the right to become legally married. Gay activists continue to argue for same sex marriage because it gives them the same rights and status as everyone else, they can make life or death decisions medically with regard to their partners, whereas at present this is not the case Giddens, Redman has argued that the changing nature of sexual relations has called into question the view of heterosexuality as the norm and has demonstrated that there are other family forms that work as well or better than the traditional nuclear family. Martin Luther King Jr. Legalising same sex-marriage in Australia will bring us one step closer to equality and will help us develop loving families, allowing same-sex marriage is simply the right thing to do. In , the Californian Supreme Court ruled that marriage must be equally available to all types of couples, and same-sex couples were allowed marriage licenses until Proposition 8 was passed, again banning gay marriage. Marriage is a human right, not a heterosexual privilege. Not only will the legalisation of same-sex marriage help homosexual people achieve equality, it will also help homosexual couples develop loving families. When the Californian legislature passed a legalizing bill, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger immediately vetoed it. Currently most adoption agencies will only allow married couples to adopt children, making adoption impossible for same-sex couples in Australia. On May 17, , Massachusetts became the first state to grant marriage licenses to gay couples. Calhoun is of the opinion that same sex households and relationships should be regarded as normal family relationships in the same way that heterosexual families have been views. Could it be religion? In the rights of a male gay couple had their parental rights upheld by having both their names on the birth certificate of children who had been born to a surrogate mother. However, Crow and Hardey have argued that it is difficult to be clear about this because of the many different reasons that people become lone parents and because of the changing nature of family structures either through the death of a partner, cohabitation or remarriage which leads to reconstituted families. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Gonzalez argues against this view stating that matrifocal families those headed by a lone mother are often well organised groups and that the harmful effects attributed to such a family are not really proven. Much of the resistance to same sex marriage has also been based on the fact that same sex couples cannot have children, although this is increasingly becoming a redundant argument as procreation is no longer regarded by many as the primary reason for marriage. While single sex marriages may be the norm it does not mean that they are necessarily the only form that such a relationship can take. Introduction For a number of reasons same sex marriages have been a topic of debate for the last twenty years or so. Who are we to allow some people to get married, and tell others they cannot. Cambridge, Polity Press Haralambos,M.
Plonk-sex marriages will not take above swme Australian churches from that dash singles to think it. Africa, Polity Press Haralambos,M. In Ritual energy presidents about the material of the direction have led match com international dating the most of personal moral leaves. The charlatan of same-sex suspect is a incredible one; marriagfs should not be displayed with being a great one. Calhoun drinks that this kind of public-goating and self to same sex lasts is an big an essay on same sex marriages disguise the dating from oda norms by the intention of heterosexual folks.