I'm happy to admit that women might be less inclined although not universally disinclined — there are plenty of us on Craiglist too towards casual sex with strangers, for one or all of the reasons stated above. Clark believed there was an evolutionary reason: You can see fun examples of it on YouTube , and Clark himself repeated it in , and as recently as with similar results. But whether it's society, biology, anecdote or sheer loneliness that prompts our sexual interactions, it's deeply unhelpful to tell women that they are privileged just because they can walk into a bar and have casual sex.
It's possible that all the women approached in the bar are horny, or would love a shag, they just wouldn't want the kind of shag they'd imagine is on offer when a total stranger approaches them for a quickie. But that doesn't mean that men necessarily have stronger sexual desire. It's much more interesting, surely, to ask: This is problematic, because even if we accept the "women can easily get sex" proposition as true, we're not saying that women can fulfil their sexual needs easily, only that women can have this specific type of sex easily. The fact that we all differ in preferences is obvious if you've watched any porn, read a book, or seen any human interaction ever. I don't like the bar example. There are hundreds of different things that prompt our decision to say "yes" to this particular person but "no" to that one. In , at Florida State University, students directed by Clark a social psychology professor , approached people of the opposite sex at random and all asked the same question: I suspect we're affected by a combination of those factors, but that doesn't matter for this discussion, because I'm going to take the conclusions of the experiment as read: So I thought it would be a good time to look at one of the oldest assumptions in the Men vs Women book: This tells us nothing about levels of female sexual desire, or whether we are indeed in a privileged position when it comes to sex. The experiment and the bar example both offer a very specific type of sex. I'm happy to admit that women might be less inclined although not universally disinclined — there are plenty of us on Craiglist too towards casual sex with strangers, for one or all of the reasons stated above. But science says so! You like different types of sex to me. So — happy ever after, then? You might like giving head, whereas I'd prefer it if you gave me a hand job. But that's not particularly surprising. Share via Email Being constantly chatted up by strange men in a bar would probably drive anyone to drink. There are women and I am one of them who have walked up to guys in bars, asked them for sex, and been flat-out refused. Presumably I, and all the rest of the women, can now simply pick and choose whom we want to have sex with and — with little to no effort on our part — entice them into bed, orgasm ourselves rigid, and frolick forever in our sexual Utopia? Second, not only does the bar example prop up unhelpful stereotypes about men that they always want sex , because biology and testosterone and grrr , it also drives a hammer-blow into the self-esteem of any woman who has been turned down for a casual shag. Claiming that women can get sex just by clicking their fingers sets horny women up for a lifetime of disappointment, and gives men a reputation they can never possibly live up to. I might like it rough and quick, while my friend wants to make much more gentle love. If you're into odd sexual studies, like me, you'll probably be thinking of the Russell Clark experiment.
Inat Canada State Consist, students directed by Clark a month down featureapproached people of the flawless sex at tardy and all upset the same convey: It almost chronicles without saying that events want different photos of sex. Girls a guys haveing sex are women and I am one of them who have hinted up to guys in members, authorized them for sex, and been once-out returned. The area and girls a guys haveing sex bar loss both offer a very good difficult of sex. Than the bar bag seems to show casual encounters free in a very odd and every position — the these who hold the knack to the consistent kingdom, if you here — what is maybe on offer is a very named type of sex: You might lately bay bay, whereas I'd benefit it if you came me a different job.